Support Pullquote, upgrade to Pro!
(Or just tweet your Pullquote for free!)
With Pullquote Pro, you'll get to:
- share on Facebook
- schedule tweets
- tweet from multiple accounts
- edit quotes
- customize colors
- change fonts
- save and index quotes
- private quotes
Choose a plan: $5/month $50/year (includes free access to any new features)
Recent quotes:
I Am Beginning to Think That the Backlash Against the Skills-Gap Story of Wage Inequality Has Gone Too Far...: Focus - Washington Center for Equitable Growth
I have always been impressed by vir illustris Mark Hoekstra’s regression-discontinuity story of the value of being admitted to U.T. Austin. As the very sharp Jordan Weissman reports:
Jordan Weissman: Does It Matter Where You Go to College?: “Study 3: IF I CAN’T GET INTO A GOOD STATE SCHOOL…
…AM I DOOMED? Actually, yeah. You might be…. Mark Hoekstra… compared the earnings of white, male students who had barely missed the admissions cut-off for an unnamed public flagship university to those of students who had barely been accepted…. Enrolling at the flagship increased wages by 20 percent…
Morning Must-Read: Mark Thoma: The Best Investment the U.S. Could Make Is Affordable Higher Education - Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Mark Thoma: The Best Investment the U.S. Could Make Is Affordable Higher Education: “The skills-gap story ignores the fact…
…that education will never be the answer for everyone…. However… a college degree is a worthwhile investment…. Fortunately for me, CSU Chico, which was nearby, only charged approximately $100 per semester…. If it hadn’t been for the cheap tuition, I would have been stuck in that town with little hope of finding my potential
Weekend Reading: Mike Konczal: Everyone Should Take It Easy on the Robot Stuff for a While (Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality...)
Mike Konczal: Everyone Should Take It Easy on the Robot Stuff for a While There's been a small, but influential...
...hysteria surrounding the idea is that a huge wave of automation, technology and skills have lead to a huge structural change in the economy since 2010. The implicit argument here is that robots and machines have both made traditional demand-side policies irrelevant or naïve, and been a major driver of wage stagnation and inequality.
Evening Must-Watch: Ezra Klein and Matthew Yglesias: Interview with Barack Obama: Teaser - Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Ezra Klein and Matthew Yglesias: Interview with Barack Obama: Teaser:
Ezra Klein: How had we gotten to the point where we can have high corporate profits and businesses can be doing so well, but the workers don’t necessarily share in that prosperity?
Barack Obama: Well, this has been at least a three decade-long trend. There are a whole bunch of reasons for that. Some of it has to do with technology and entire sectors being eliminated–travel agents, bank tellers, a lot of middle management. A lot of it has to do with globalization–the rest of the world catching up. Post-World War II we had just some enormous structural advantages because our competitors had been devastated by war and we had made investments that put us ahead of the curve–education and infrastructure. Those advantages went away at the same time that workers had increasingly less leverage because of changes in labor laws. You combine all that stuff and it puts workers in a tougher position. So some people who just control enormous amounts of wealth–we don’t resent their success, but, just as a practical matter, we’re going to have problems making sure that we are investing enough in the common good to move forward.
Ezra Klein: Has this put us in a place long-term where redistribution becomes in a sense a positive in and of itself?
Barack Obama: I don’t think that is entirely new. Relative to our post-World War II history taxes now are not particularly high or particularly progressive compared to what they were in say the late 1950s or 1960s. There has always been this notion that for a country to thrive there are some things that, as Lincoln said, we do better together than we can do for ourselves, whether that is building roads or setting up effective power grids or making sure that we have got high-quality public education or that teachers are paid enough. The market will not cover those things, and we have to do them together. Basic research falls in that category. That has always been true. Part of what has changed is that a lot of that burden for making sure that the pie was properly shared took place before government even got involved. If you had stronger unions than you had higher wages. If you had a corporate culture that felt a sense of place and commitment, so that the CEO felt a real affinity for the community to reinvest in that community and to be seen as a corporate citizen. Today what we have is quarterly earning reports, compensation levels for CEOs that are tied directly to those quarterly earnings, you have international capital that is demanding short-term profits, and so what happens is that a lot of the distributional questions that used to be handled in the marketplace through decent wages or health care or defined-benefit pension plans–those all are eliminated, and the average employee–the average worker–doesn’t feel any benefit…